Spade & the Grave

death and burial through an archaeological lens

One Common Skull – A case study at Old Burying Point, Salem, MA.

4 Comments

I recently had the pleasure of visiting some of the historic burial grounds in Salem, Massachusetts during my recently holiday to the area. I was particularly excited to visit Salem because it was not only an important site in the history of colonial New England, but it was a part of the survey I did of settlements for my MA research so getting to see it in person was a real treat! I decided to use the opportunity as a case study to investigate a particularly popular gravestone design.
June28_1Pictured above is the historic Old Burying Point, otherwise known as the Charter Street Cemetery. The site is the oldest organized European burial ground in Salem, and was established in 1637 by the Puritan peoples who founded the modern settlement. It was never associated with a meeting house or church, which is typical of an early C17th Puritan settlement.

June28_2

Here I am with the sign marking the first meeting house location in Salem, erected 1634. Note the lack of graves nearby! Photo by Ian Petty, 2017. 

When we arrived, I had intended to look for hexfoils in order continue my previous train of thought regarding fossilized folk culture in early New England, but I couldn’t find a single one at the Old Burying Point! If anyone knows of any that I missed, please send a photo my way! Also, if you have any hexfoils or similar designs from the Broad Street burial ground, I completely forgot to go there (I’m blaming the heat) and it would be great to see what they have in terms of early stones and protective markers.

What I did notice was something I was also anticipating: That one Death’s Head style! I talked about some examples of the style in a previous post that you can check out HERE if you missed it, so I was eager to find some comparative examples somewhere other than Boston.

Salem did not disappoint!

I was looking for the same death’s head style as was present on the two examples we have here in Newfoundland, the skull with the wedge over the nose and wings in the lunette (high top bump), circular pattern in the finials (smaller side bumps flanking middle), matching flora in the boarders (self-explanatory), and of course the inscription in the middle. There was some variation in styles of course, as I suspect this design was popular and therefore re-produced by many artists as a result. This could also explain why I haven’t been able to track down any carver-
specific information for this particular pattern yet.

What I did find was that this particular design was very popular in the later half of the 18th-century, but didn’t really extend into the 19th century other than one example in the Howard St. Cemetery in Salem from 1802, but that stone didn’t have the floral border to go with the skull.

As you can see from the two examples above, there was some variation in style but the overall design was the same.

June28_4

This is the earliest example of the style I saw at the Old Burying Point, Salem, MA. It dates to 1727/8. Photo by author, 2017. 

With the two examples from Newfoundland dating to 17[??] and 177[2/9?], it is safe to assume that this design was at the height of its popularity in the latter half of the 18th-century.

Out of the 17 stones I photographed, this was the date breakdown:
– 1727/8
– 1755
– 1760, 1761, 1763, 1763 & 1764, 1674, 1764, 1765
– 1773
– 1780, 1780, 1781, 1781, 1782, 1783
– 1 unknown

I would have made a graph for you, but as this was a preliminary survey of a single site it wouldn’t tell us very much in the long run! Gotta get more data!

What this short study does tell us is that there was a definite trend towards this style of gravestone through a large portion of the 18th-century. While there were many other contemporaneous patterns and variations on patterns throughout the burial ground, this particular design was revisited again and again, likely by different artists who may have only done the imagery and left the text to another carver as was common.

I’m looking forward to investigating this style further in the future, and am happy with the results of this quick preliminary case study in order to come up with a potential date-range that can help narrow down when this style was popular, as well as narrow down potential carvers from the records. It was interesting to see this death’s head style on a 19th-century example as well, and I’ll definitely be keeping an eye out for more of the same in the future!

I’d love to hear your feedback on this survey, and if you have any interesting examples to add do send them my way! My fieldwork season is starting on Tuesday of next week, and I look forward to sharing some photos and experiences from the summer with all of you as well.

Jun28_3

Just an idea of how many gravestones displayed this pattern at the Old Burying Point, Salem, MA. Photo by author, 2017. 

 

Author: Robyn S. Lacy

Archaeologist / Cultural Heritage / Burial Ground Restoration

4 thoughts on “One Common Skull – A case study at Old Burying Point, Salem, MA.

  1. Pingback: Imported gravestones from Massachusetts in Atlantic Canada & examples from Cambridge (One common skull, continued) | Spade & the Grave

  2. Hexfoils weren’t common in eastern mass however western mass carvers sometimes used them. Two exceptions to the rule in eastern mass are Jonathan and Moses Worcester who carved out of black slate in the Merrimack Valley in the early to mid 1700s. The Hexfoil Rosette was also extremely common in Connecticut especially used by carvers Obediah Wheeler, and Benjamin Collins, though also by Johnathin Loomis, Peter Barker, The Hampton Indian Carver, among others. Other rosette designs were common in CT as well including the spiralled rosette used by Thomas Johnson, Luther Lathrop , John Hartshorne and Tolland Ghost Carver, and the clover rosette used by Gershom Bartlett, Hartshorne again, the early work of Josiah Manning, Ebeneezer Drake, etc

    Like

  3. Also the Winged/Cossbones Skull was actually the most common design for Tombstones in the western mass region from the 1660s, until the latter half of the 1700s, when the Soul Effigies also became popular. Starting with the unknown carver called the “Old master” who carved from the 1660s until the turn of the century and is represented at this burying ground, he carved out of either Boston or Charelstown Mass and many other carvers would apprentice with him notably Joseph Lamson. Once more carvers emerged Boston area slates were prized and exported up and down the coast as far south as South Carolina and of course youve seen the ones in Canada. Skulls were usually winged with crossbones much far less common though certainly present. By the dawn of the enlightenment the skull was being largely phased out and by 1805 was almost entirely gone. Oddly outside of Eastern Mass soul effigies were much more popular for the regional carvers though skull designs could still be found in some work of carvers in NJ, NY and CT. Check out out the work of the John Stevens shop in New Port or any of the Brownstone Connecticut Valley river carvers,

    Like

Leave a Reply to K Day Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s